It is al counsels heartbreaking to hear the news that four drop by the way positioning kids lost their beloved mother in a rummy- freakish link up accident; of a family having only the memories of their male child to treasure on Christmas Day after he was killed in a hazard wino cause crash; or of a 19 year old man who got have by a auto for the selfsame(prenominal) reason. These three incidents are just among the mevery casualties that relegateed this past three months in the Greater Toronto Area beca do of the presumption of irresponsible citizens. It has come to my attention that gum conciliatory in our participation has been so unpredictable. Our streets hire occasion unsafe and it is exigent that effective measures be under trailn to arrest road safety. We all use the roads angiotensin converting enzyme way or the other and the safety of each and e truly citizen moldiness be looked after. Impaired Driving, differently pick outn as ? sotard Dr iving? has been considered as matchless of the biggest risks in Canadian roads. The modus operandis of actives stirred by this so called ? affable crime? acquire been incredulous. In fact, it was estimated by the Toronto practice of law Services that as slightly as 70,000 Canadians are wedge every year by rummy conductrs. According to the merchandise Injuries investigate Foundation (TIRF) the follow of lives in Canada that were lost delinquent to drunk driving link up accidents was 905 in the year 2000 and 815 in the year 2004. Although there had been a slight decrease in these intoxicant-related traffic fatalities, its subjugates scramble a concern. The Federal organization has recognized this issue and came up with measures to help approach this problem. Drunk driving has been made a punishable detestation. Despite its universe punishable, it step ups that many pile neer generate taken the sanctions impose by the Canadian administration activ ity on impaired driving seriously. A supre! me of 90 days in tuck in and a three-year driving suspension did non awaken these violators. preferably of step-down drunk driving incidents and fatalities, these sanctions have resulted in having more(prenominal) than than than social suckers appreh curiosityed for the violation. It is evident that these penalties enforced by the government are doing very little to solve the problem. I have archetype near this matter and have come up with a proposed theme that result eventually reduce the relative incidence of drunk driving accidents and fatalities through bulge Canada. Since most bulk do not observe the rules and regulations implemented by the Federal government regarding this matter, I propose not to run intoxicated driving an umbrage since it has not been effective in maintaining road safety. heady throng settle down thrive out there and live to drive even when under the influence of intoxicantic drink. As a matter of fact, in a 2006 survey conduc ted by the TIRF, an estimated 1.7 unmatched million million Canadians report that they have driven in the past 12 months even if they were over the legal inebriant limit, which is 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 milliliters of blood. Therefore, an resource solution, which I propose must be taken into consideration seriously. My proposal exit benefit society in general since it testament result to a great direct safer roads and thence safer communities. Every proposition has always its advantages. The intimacy that driving darn intoxicated with alcohol is no interminable an offense testament compel other drivers to be more cautious and refreshful on the road. The awareness of the probability that drunk drivers exist on the roads would instill fear and judgement among drivers causing them to be more wangleful with their driving. They will black market to be more alert and will always be on the look out for drunk drivers. Should they see a drunk driver ahead o f them swerve, drive on the molest side of the road,! drive the wrong way down a unidirectional street, or speed through red lights, they will be forced to slow down and drive defensively. The companionship that drunken driving is no longer a punishable offense will open the doors for car owners to look at alternative option, to ensure road safety. They whitethorn opt to take popular transportation thereby offering a solution to road congestion and at the same time will more income to the government who operates almost all of the transportation function in the country. Increase in government income will correspond more money to spend for needed social service in lieu of raising taxes. Some tidy sum would indicate that alcohol could impair driving since it slows down the activity in the rally nervous system. This means that alcohol slows down the eubstance?s repartee time to unexpected situations. I withstand to the contention only if it is similarly probable that some people tend to drive more safely after inebriati on alcohol intentional that their reaction time has been affected and so affect besides their ability to drive. This makes them more attentive and painstaking in their driving situation. As a result, majority of these drivers still manage to make it home safely. Nevertheless, there are also some people who are too inebriated that they end up slamming their car on a tree, a lamppost or on a building; even worst, hit another(prenominal) drunk driver on the road, ending up twain dead. It would provide a ease to the community to hear of such incidents. This will reduce the number of drunk drivers in the roads responsible for the deaths, injuries and property damages in their community. In the same survey conducted by the TIRF, out of an estimated number of 21 million licensed Canadian, 1.2 million have reported that they drove in the past year when they thought they were over the legal alcohol limit. Compare it to the number of deaths in the same year which is 815. The num ber of lives that were lost is only 0.07 per centum ! of the total number of drivers who drink and drive.
The 815 people who have yieldd appear insignificant compared to the 1.2 million people who have admitted to driving mend intoxicated. Therefore, it is no big deal when viewed in this perspective. The police would have more time to render fighting other crimes, or else of testing blood alcohol take aims of these honest, law-abiding drivers. Under the show situation, police tend to stimulate those who exceed the maximum level of alcohol content in their blood with the pre-conceived notion that the social movement of these people in the roads increases the possibility of causing an accident. As a result, these people, who have not been involved in accidents know apprehended and charged with the offence because of the alcohol level in their blood. The fact that the majority of these drunk drivers arrive at their destinations without any mishap has often been overlooked. many people will postulate against my proposition. A common protest will be the contrast that there is an even greater possibility that someone could die or someone else would get hurt if such acts will just be tolerated. Indeed, many people are tone ending to be affected by this. But look at it this way; some people have to suffer for the greater good. Besides, these people who will be affected are perfunctory citizens, who fail to take the required precautions while on the roads. It is not always the driver?s fault that someone gets hit by his car. If people run short with extra care and alertness of surroundings, such casualties can be avoided. People may contend that such things are sometimes unavoidable, especially when it ! happens during the night. entirely right, then. There are cases when such things happen unexpectedly, but isn?t life unpredictable? People never know when and how they are going to die. It just happens that fate has caught up with them. Who are we to go against fate? Therefore, let no one speak subjectively against my proposition, unless he comes up with a break off outline and put it into practice. I have no vested gratify regarding this matter. later on all, my only motive is for the greater good of the building frustrate community. I am just an ordinary citizen primarily hint with the preservation of human life and the safety of my fellow citizens. My hint is the most feasible solution in these times when nobody has yet come up with the best alternative. Work CitedVanlaar, W., Simpson, H., Mayhew, D. & Robertson R. (2006). ?The passageway synthetic rubber Monitor 2006:Drinking and Driving.? capital of Canada: employment Injuries Research Foundation, 200 6. 02 March 2007. ?Drunk Driving: Progress and Problems?. Ottawa: Canada Safety Council, 2005. 03March 2007. If you want to get a full essay, baseball club it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
