HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE, Case Study Essay

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE, Case Study - Essay Example The perceived areas where Ando Enterprises (AEL) needs change are in recruitment, retention, motivation in addition to training and development. Each division has its own HR policies and procedures which to a large extent is responsible for repetitive expenditures. Thus, keeping a centralized approach, each of the divisions has to be handled strategically to minimize costs and keep the staff motivated. The roles of the top management have to be redefined. A centralized approach at AEL is essential in some areas. Strategic HR has led to redefining the roles of the top management. They offer ‘transformational leadership’ and they share their vision for future success with other employees. Certain issues are too complex for the top management to comprehend and it is easier for the local managers to respond fast to it. This is confirmed by Thornhill and Saunders (1998) who contend that middle managers play a vital role in any organization because they are the ones who interact most frequently with the employees. They are thus expected to have the ability to inspire, encourage, motivate, enable and facilitate change by allowing the employees to become committed to the organization. When middle managers are allowed to use discretion and take decision, it prepares them to be future managers at top management. Besides, the cost to company is reduced with such a practice, cont ends Budhwar (2000). Hence the first step that AEL needs to take is to decentralize certain areas of HR while keeping the framing of policies with the top management. The role of new personnel is not to shake the HRD but to give the right direction. Today the HR personnel may not be in a position to understand the employee and his problems as there is no regular interaction between them. The HRD can take the lead role in framing policies but this too has to be done in

Cooperation is more important than competition Essay

Cooperation is more important than competition - Essay Example In cooperation, there is the collective role of achieving a goal for the benefit of everyone. Competition in businesses leads to the production of better products and services; however, it may lead to the collapse of one business, leaving the other one in the market. In personal development, cooperation is more preferable. It results in better individuals and better society as a whole. Teamwork is the major bearer of cooperation, in which the productivity of each individual is enhanced. The society today embraces competition, which is problematic, instead of embracing cooperation for positive individual and societal growth. Social conditioning is to blame for high competition in the world today. Schools teach students to compete academically, while in the business world, promotions and salary increments are offered on merit of improvements on performances, which is based on ranks. Big businesses, learning institutions, health care institutions, as well as parents still perpetuate the competition element, disregarding cooperation. None of them realizes the adverse effects competition has on the economy, as well as personal development of individuals. It is quite unfortunate that people are not taught cooperative skills at an early age. This has fostered a culture of competition in the society today. ... Besides, cooperation involves making other people better. This is because while cooperating, talented individuals uplift the less talented individuals. Cooperation in itself is fulfilling and therefore, individuals must adopt it. The skills of cooperation should be imparted in individuals when they are still in their early ages. This way, children grow up into adults who value and embrace cooperation. The process of life is all about relationships and interactions between different people. No man is an island, and therefore, each individual is guaranteed of these interactions. An individual’s life journey starting at their home, school, and workplace is about meeting people and living with them. A student cannot study on their own, an employee too cannot work alone, and neither can a person engage in leisure activities alone. Therefore, if individuals lack cooperation, they will live miserable lives, since they cannot harmoniously co-exist with others. Skills of cooperation mu st be inherent in people in order for them to face different situations life presents to them. Cooperation leads to development of the society. In cooperation, one plus one is larger than two, while in competition, it is a zero-sum game, where one wins, and another loses. A case in point is, if two companies are in a competition, one will definitely lose and maybe fall out of business, while the other remains stronger in the market. If this trend is popular in a country, the number of companies may drop, thus adversely affecting the country’s economy. On the other hand, if two companies decide to cooperate, this results in equal growth of the companies, as they will share improvement ideas. Alternatively, they may merge and form a bigger, stronger company.